Connect with us

General

Coming Soon: Your Travel Will Be Restricted By Personal Carbon Allowances

Published

on

“Experts suggest” your standard of living be reduced by over 85%

A
report on the future of travel and tourism, co-authored by a travel
agency called Intrepid Travel and The Future Labs Institute, posits a
future deeply impacted by climate change and restrictions on tourist
travel to combat it.

“A Sustainable Future for Travel”, warns of “travel extinction”, where some areas suffer such radical climate change that all tourism there ceases, and “personal carbon allowances” that will restrict how often one is permitted travel.

From the report (pardon the length, emphasis added):

“Carbon Passports

A personal carbon emissions limit will become the new normal as policy and people’s values drive an era of great change.

As demonstrated by a worldwide tourism boom, the frequency at which we can fly is once again seemingly unlimited.

Conscience and budgets permitting, we feel free to hop on planes from one place to the next. But this will change. ‘On
our current trajectory, we can expect a pushback against the frequency
with which individuals can travel, with carbon passports set to change
the tourism landscape,’
 says Raymond [Martin Raymond, Future Laboratories co-founder]

Personal carbon allowances could help curb carbon emissions and lower travel’s overall footprint.

These allowances will manifest as passports that force people to ration their carbon in line with the global carbon budget, which is 750bn tonnes until 2050.

By 2040, we can expect to see limitations imposed on the amount of travel that is permitted each year.

Experts suggest that individuals should currently limit their carbon emissions to 2.3 tonnes each year –
the equivalent of taking a round-trip from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. However, the average carbon footprint in the US is
16 tonnes per person per year, 15 tonnes in Australia and 11.7 tonnes
in the UK. This is in stark contrast to where we may find ourselves in
the future, with 2040’s travellers forced to forgo the horizon-expanding
experiences so readily embraced by today’s tourists”

For
all practical purposes, your carbon emissions will line up with your
energy usage, give or take a relatively narrow band of efficiencies
(unless we have some kind of clean energy breakthrough, and the only
viable one we have, nuclear, is not considered clean energy by the
climate cult).

Said differently: Your standard of living is your energy usageReducing a society’s energy usage is the same as reducing its living standards.

With this in mind, let’s look at the numbers cited by the Sustainable Future for Travel report:

“Experts suggest that individuals should currently limit their carbon emissions to 2.3 tonnes each year.”

The
table below lays out exactly how much the standard of living for the
residents of each country will have to be reduced in order to meet the
recommended carbon quota set by unelected experts. This is the level of
“degrowth” it will take to satisfy the objectives of climate alarmists
relying on unfalsifiable premises, arbitrary computer models, and who
are deliberately ignoring and suppressing countervailing data.

How serious are our leaders and policymakers about reducing the citizenry’s living standards by upwards of 85%?

Here
is Canada’s Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault, rather blithely
confirming that the government will limit natural gas usage in order to
fight climate change:

Reporter: There will be limitations on how much natural gas you can use in the winter?

Guilbeault: Yes, absolutely, that’s what fighting climate change looks like.

Full clip:

Canadian Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault rather blithely answering a reporter who asked “will the government limit natural gas usage in the winter?”

(Short answer: “Of Course! That’s What fighting climate change looks like!”)

Watch: pic.twitter.com/sau9p2CMnW

— Mark Jeftovic, The ₿itcoin Capitalist (@StuntPope) November 25, 2023

Why are we talking about carbon passports in the section on Central Bank Digital Currencies?

(Today’s post is an excerpt from the “Eye on Evilcoin” section of this month’s Bitcoin Capitalist macro overview).

Because we think CBDCs will invariably launch as, or morph into, personal carbon footprint quotas.

Right
now, what we call “the fiat money system” uses debt for money. That’s
no longer sustainable, so what we’re expecting is an attempt to switch
what we loosely identify as “money”, away from symbolic tokens backed by
debt, to social credit scores, backed by personal carbon footprint quotas.

Expanding on this theme, probably, is another report from Future Labs on “Neo-Collectivism”,
which may give us a hint at how the policymakers of late stage
globalism will seek to preempt free markets and universal human rights
with a “we’re all in this together” retread of what is essentially,
communism:

“Society is facing a mass re-organisation. United by values of empathy and community, consumers are shunning individualism in favour of alliances that are decentralising industries and redistributing power at scale”

LS:N
Global and Future Laboratories seem like a wannabe World Economic
Forum. Lots of pronouns on the “Team” page, and leaning heavily into
that euphemistic WEF-speak that makes technocratic communism sound
benign and fashionable.

I ended up shelling out £265 to buy the
Neo-Collectivist Megatrend report (a 40 page PDF) and what I found in
there was along the lines of what one might expect, but it was alarming
all the same.

In the next post to this one, we’ll dive into it and
find out just how the “Zalpha Generation” is poised to usher us into an
era of Systemic Endemic Socialism.

*  *  *

My forthcoming ebook The CBDC Survival Guide will
give you the tools and the knowledge to navigate coming era of Monetary
Apartheid. Bombthrower subscribers will get free when it drops, sign up today.

If you’re curious about The Bitcoin Capitalist Letter I will be closing it off to new subscribers soon. I explain why to Bombthrower subscribers. Follow me on Nostr, or Twitter.

Authored by Mark Jeftovic via BombThrower.com,

Continue Reading

General

CNN Anchor Claims Dangerous Filthy Slums in America Are ‘Vibrant Expressions of Democracy’

Published

on

By


CNN host Fareed Zakaria aired an astonishing rant this past
weekend arguing that major US cities are filthy and dangerous because of
“democracy,” and that makes them more “vibrant.”

Zakaria was attempting to provide a counter argument to Tucker
Carlson’s recent report that Russia’s subways are nicer than America’s.

CNN host Fareed Zakaria asserts that democracy goes hand in hand with living in a complete shit hole, and argues dirtier and chaotic cities are more ‘vibrant’ than clean cities which are usually run by ‘authoritarians’. Report: https://t.co/1Pa2QGS8gL pic.twitter.com/tKKZW2PRRJ

— m o d e r n i t y (@ModernityNews) February 19, 2024

Modernity.news reports: “American cities are expressions of democracy,” Zakaria asserted, claiming they are “places where people have to negotiate differences and find ways to live together, that makes them messier and dirtier and sometimes chaotic.”

He then argued “perhaps that is what has made these cities so vibrant and innovative, and why they have been at the forefront in making America the country that leads the world in economics, technology, culture and power.”

Is rampant crime, homelessness, and drug use part of said vibrancy?

Fact check. American cities were not shit holes when the country emerged as the envy of the world. 

Zakaria continued, “Carlson speaks enviously of cities like Tokyo, Singapore, Abu Dhabi and Dubai, and they are indeed wonderful in their own distinctive ways. But what’s striking about all of them is that they are somewhat tame and subdued. The product of authoritarian governments or conformist culture, or both. American cities are different.”

He appears to be seriously claiming that you cannot  have a clean and safe city without some kind of evil dictatorship overseeing it.

Zakaria continued “Carlson put forward a bizarre hodgepodge of assertions he thought the architecture, food and service in Moscow was better than in any American city. Really? Moscow?”

“Outside of a small historic center, it is filled with drab Soviet era concrete buildings. And while the food in Moscow can be quite good…Better than New York or San Francisco? You need to get out more” Zakaria concluded.

Has he been to San Francisco lately?

Continue Reading

General

Jacob Rothschild: “My family created Israel”

Published

on

By

 

Israel is a fake state created by evil globalists.

Jacob Rothschild: “My family created Israel”

Israel is a fake state created by evil globalists.???????? pic.twitter.com/sGj3M8aezG

— Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis (@DrLoupis) February 18, 2024

 

Continue Reading

Trending

Generated by Feedzy