Connect with us


UC San Francisco engaging in horrifying experiments, organ harvesting of live babies in the name of “science”



(Planet Today) Another American school, the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), has been outed for murdering babies and harvesting their vital organs in the name of “science.”

(Article by Ethan Huff republished from

Just like the University of Pittsburgh, UCSF is engaging in gruesome “medical” experiments that involve both unborn and recently born babies bring torn limb from limb while they are still alive, only to be murdered after the dirty deed is done.

UCSF would not be doing this were it not for the large government grants coming from Tony Fauci, who we now know is funneling millions of American taxpayer dollars into the coffers of these baby butcher mills.

Pro-Life San Francisco found that the baby body parts are being harvested from living children at two different UCSF-affiliated “Women’s Options Center” locations in the California Bay Area.

“Studies show that the labor induction abortion techniques used in these facilities to procure ‘fresh’ parts can result in live births as often as 50% of the time,” according to pro-life group Live Action, explaining why organs are harvested while the children are still alive.

Under the California Public Records Act, Pro-Life San Francisco was able to make requests for the following information:

  • “Any and all UCSF protocols and procedures for determining the viability of a neonate after labor induction abortion procedures including … in instances where the neonate is born alive after the procedure is performed,”
  • “UCSF’s protocols and procedures regarding the delivery of medical care to neonates born at the Women’s Options Center[s],” and
  • “Human fetal tissue procurement logs.”

The group also made several other requests that have yet to be fulfilled, and all of them contain gruesome details about the atrocities taking place at UCSF. Eleanor Drey, a UCSF professor and director of one of the Women’s Options Center locations, has already referenced some of it in medical research, but Pro-Life San Francisco is digging for more.

UCSF’s Women’s Options Centers are a “free-for-all” where babies are murdered like they are nothing

In correspondences with UCSF, Pro-Life San Francisco was told that there are no documents to turn over because the Women’s Options Centers have “no protocol” for determining the viability of abortion survivors, nor do they provide care to them.

“This is a tacit admission of the possibility that abortion survivors are simply left to die, without so much as the basic humane provision of palliative care,” Live Action explains.

“The situation at UCSF’s Women’s Options Centers is essentially a free-for-all, where each abortion survivor’s life hinges upon the whim of the abortionist paid to kill him or her.”

What this just goes to show is that the concept of “viability,” which is often thrown around in pro-abortion circles, is meaningless. It is little more than a “moving target which will inevitably vary from individual to individual,” Live Action warns. Depending on the political and religious leanings of an abortionist, viability can mean terminating a perfectly healthy baby for the “greater good” or doing everything possible with the latest science to save him or her. In practical terms, it is subjectively applied.

“So, viability is a complicated medical construct,” admitted Colleen McNicholas, chief medical officer for Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region in Southwest Missouri, during a testimony before Congress.

“There is no particular gestational age. There are some pregnancies in which a fetus will never be viable. There are a number of different factors that we think about when we’re considering if a pregnancy is or isn’t viable.”

The latest news about the abortion industry and its bloodlust for baby tissue and profit can be found at

Continue Reading


Experts Declare Experimental Cancer Vaccine Based On mRNA Technology Is ‘Safe and Effective’




A new cancer vaccine based on Covid mRNA vaccine technology
which has yet to be clinically tested has already been declared “safe
and effective” by the British government.

Known as ‘LungVax’,
the new vaccine is being developed by the University of Oxford, the
Francis Crick Institute and University College London, and is expected
to be the first of a huge range of new cancer vaccinations available in
the near future.

Research scientists developing the ‘groundbreaking’ lung cancer
vaccine claim it will be effective in preventing up to 90 per cent of
cases by training the immune system to locate and attack early signs of

Lung cancer cells look different from normal cells due to having ‘red
flag’ proteins called neoantigens. The LungVax vaccine will carry a strand of DNA which trains the immune system to recognize these neoantigens on abnormal lung cells.

It will then instruct the immune system to destroy these cells and stop lung cancer.

Professor Tim Elliot, lead researcher at the University of Oxford, said: ‘Cancer
is a disease of our own bodies and it’s hard for the immune system to
distinguish between what’s normal and what’s cancer. 

‘Getting the immune system to recognize and attack cancer is one of the biggest challenges in cancer research today.”

Elliot admitted the new vaccine is based on technology used to create the Covid vaccine.

‘This research could deliver an off-the-shelf vaccine based on
Oxford’s vaccine technology, which proved itself in the Covid pandemic.

Remarkably, given the disastrous health consequences for those
vaccinated with the experimental Covid vaccines, Eilliot praised the
mRNA roll out as a success.

‘If we can replicate the kind of success seen in trials during
the pandemic, we could save the lives of tens of thousands of people
every year in the UK alone.’

Researchers have been granted up to £1.7 million from Cancer Research UK and the CRIS Cancer Foundation.

The team will receive funding for the study over the next 2 years to
support lab research and initial manufacturing of 3,000 doses of the
vaccine at the Oxford Clinical BioManufacturing Facility.

If successful, the vaccine will move straight into a clinical trials,
involving those at biggest risk of disease, such as current and former
smokers who currently qualify for targeted lung health checks in some
parts of the UK.

Continue Reading


TV Host Demands Gov’t ‘Take Control’ of Elon Musk’s X To ‘Shut Down’ Conspiracy Theories




Elon Musk’s X must be “shut down” by government because dangerous “conspiracy theories” are spreading on the social media platform, according to British TV host Jeremy Vine.

“If there any argument to say, and this will sound crazy, but
China does it, we’ve got to now take control of Twitter and shut it down
for the time being,”
said Vine.

Vine made the comments earlier this week during a heated debate
regarding speculation surrounding the health and whereabouts of Kate
Middleton, the Princess of Wales.

‘We’ve now got to take control of Twitter’…..???????????? ⁦

— Right Said Fred (@TheFreds) March 20, 2024

Boomers have become obsessed with speculating that Middleton has died or is severely unwell and that the Royal Family is hiding it because she hasn’t been seen in months after an operation.

The manipulation of a series of photo of Middleton and her children also only served to fuel the rumors, as some sources close to the princess claimed she had been murdered by the royal family.

However, instead of dismissing the whole issue for what it is, a pointless distraction that will disappear once Middleton makes a public appearance around Easter, Vine called for draconian measures.

Modernity report:

Ah yes, the Communist dictatorship of China, which shuts down the Internet to clamp down on dissent and enhance its repression of undesirables.

That’s definitely who we should be mimicking, Jeremy.

Throughout the COVID pandemic, Vine’s show was a platform for some of the most vulgar, authoritarian drivel imaginable.

One show asked if children who are unvaccinated should be banned from schools or made to wear special badges.

Another asked, “Is it time to ban the unvaccinated from traveling?”

Vine has made a name for himself as being a dutiful amplifier of regime messaging, while his annoying side hobby of biking around London looking to film confrontations with motorists has also angered many.

Continue Reading


Generated by Feedzy