Connect with us

General

U.S. Government is Demanding Details on Your Fertility, Bathing Habits, More

Published

on

 (Photo by No Revisions on Unsplash)

This article originally appeared on WND.com

Guest by post by Bob Unruh 

‘The potential for abuse is grave’

A top-flight legal team is protesting schemes by the U.S. Census
Bureau to demand, from millions of Americans, details about their
fertility.

And about their bathing habits.

And about their work commute.

And their utility costs.

And cognitive disabilities.

And mental disabilities.

And their marital history.

“In an age when the government has significant technological
resources at its disposal to not only carry out warrantless surveillance
on American citizens but also to harvest and mine that data for its own
dubious purposes, whether it be crime-mapping or profiling based on
race or religion, the potential for abuse is grave,” explained
constitutional attorney John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford
Institute and author of “Battlefield America: The War on the American
People.”

“Any attempt by the government to encroach upon the citizenry’s
privacy rights or establish a system by which the populace can be
targeted, tracked and singled out must be met with extreme caution. The
American Community Survey qualifies as a government program whose
purpose, while seemingly benign, raises significant constitutional
concerns.”

The organization said it is “pushing back” against the campaign by
the U.S. Census Bureau to collect “sensitive private information about
individuals, using the mandatory American Community Survey.”

“In addition to the already extensive and invasive list of personal
questions included on the ACS, the Census Bureau issued a notice of
proposed information collection seeking to add questions about each
household member’s level of certain disabilities, including mental
disabilities, and whether they have psychosocial, cognitive, or speech
disabilities,” the Rutherford report said.

“The bureau also seeks to ask about possession of electric vehicles,
use of solar panels, type of sewage disposal, and other matters.”

Those federal bureaucrats already had sought permission to demand
information about ‘each person’s sexual orientation and gender
identity,” and institute attorneys submitted formal public comments in
opposition.

It argued that the federal government’s “threats and intimidation
tactics” is a form of illegal compelled speech in violation of the First
Amendment. The moves also violate the right to privacy from government
intrusion under the Fourth Amendment, the institute charged.

The institute already has guidelines on its site for responding to
the intrusion, and has provided a form complaint letter for lodging
objections.

The ACS is that “highly invasive, ongoing monthly survey issued by
the U.S. Census Bureau to collect detailed housing and socioeconomic
data from about 3.5 million households each year.”

Through it, the government demands that Americans “provide the
government with extensive and sensitive information about each and every
person in their household, including their work schedules, their
physical disabilities and limitations, the number of automobiles kept at
the residence, and their access to phone-service and the internet. The
information collected by the ACS is not anonymous: the survey is to
contain the name, age, sex, race, and home address of each person at the
residence, along with their relationship to the person who fills out
the form and that person’s phone number.”

The report said the Census Bureau “repeatedly sends field
representatives to their homes at unannounced times to harass” people
who don’t respond as the government demands.

Those reports document how government agents “remained outside …
houses for hours while waiting for them to arrive home or come out, have
walked around their homes, and have talked to minor children when
parents were away.”

Copyright 2023 WND News Center

Continue Reading

General

Experts Declare Experimental Cancer Vaccine Based On mRNA Technology Is ‘Safe and Effective’

Published

on

By


A new cancer vaccine based on Covid mRNA vaccine technology
which has yet to be clinically tested has already been declared “safe
and effective” by the British government.

Known as ‘LungVax’,
the new vaccine is being developed by the University of Oxford, the
Francis Crick Institute and University College London, and is expected
to be the first of a huge range of new cancer vaccinations available in
the near future.

Research scientists developing the ‘groundbreaking’ lung cancer
vaccine claim it will be effective in preventing up to 90 per cent of
cases by training the immune system to locate and attack early signs of
disease.

Lung cancer cells look different from normal cells due to having ‘red
flag’ proteins called neoantigens. The LungVax vaccine will carry a strand of DNA which trains the immune system to recognize these neoantigens on abnormal lung cells.

It will then instruct the immune system to destroy these cells and stop lung cancer.

Professor Tim Elliot, lead researcher at the University of Oxford, said: ‘Cancer
is a disease of our own bodies and it’s hard for the immune system to
distinguish between what’s normal and what’s cancer. 

‘Getting the immune system to recognize and attack cancer is one of the biggest challenges in cancer research today.”

Elliot admitted the new vaccine is based on technology used to create the Covid vaccine.

‘This research could deliver an off-the-shelf vaccine based on
Oxford’s vaccine technology, which proved itself in the Covid pandemic.

Remarkably, given the disastrous health consequences for those
vaccinated with the experimental Covid vaccines, Eilliot praised the
mRNA roll out as a success.

‘If we can replicate the kind of success seen in trials during
the pandemic, we could save the lives of tens of thousands of people
every year in the UK alone.’

Researchers have been granted up to £1.7 million from Cancer Research UK and the CRIS Cancer Foundation.

The team will receive funding for the study over the next 2 years to
support lab research and initial manufacturing of 3,000 doses of the
vaccine at the Oxford Clinical BioManufacturing Facility.

If successful, the vaccine will move straight into a clinical trials,
involving those at biggest risk of disease, such as current and former
smokers who currently qualify for targeted lung health checks in some
parts of the UK.

Continue Reading

General

TV Host Demands Gov’t ‘Take Control’ of Elon Musk’s X To ‘Shut Down’ Conspiracy Theories

Published

on

By


Elon Musk’s X must be “shut down” by government because dangerous “conspiracy theories” are spreading on the social media platform, according to British TV host Jeremy Vine.

“If there any argument to say, and this will sound crazy, but
China does it, we’ve got to now take control of Twitter and shut it down
for the time being,”
said Vine.

Vine made the comments earlier this week during a heated debate
regarding speculation surrounding the health and whereabouts of Kate
Middleton, the Princess of Wales.

‘We’ve now got to take control of Twitter’…..???????????? ⁦@elonmuskpic.twitter.com/GonHWCr90c

— Right Said Fred (@TheFreds) March 20, 2024

Boomers have become obsessed with speculating that Middleton has died or is severely unwell and that the Royal Family is hiding it because she hasn’t been seen in months after an operation.

The manipulation of a series of photo of Middleton and her children also only served to fuel the rumors, as some sources close to the princess claimed she had been murdered by the royal family.

However, instead of dismissing the whole issue for what it is, a pointless distraction that will disappear once Middleton makes a public appearance around Easter, Vine called for draconian measures.

Modernity report:

Ah yes, the Communist dictatorship of China, which shuts down the Internet to clamp down on dissent and enhance its repression of undesirables.

That’s definitely who we should be mimicking, Jeremy.

Throughout the COVID pandemic, Vine’s show was a platform for some of the most vulgar, authoritarian drivel imaginable.

One show asked if children who are unvaccinated should be banned from schools or made to wear special badges.

Another asked, “Is it time to ban the unvaccinated from traveling?”

Vine has made a name for himself as being a dutiful amplifier of regime messaging, while his annoying side hobby of biking around London looking to film confrontations with motorists has also angered many.

Continue Reading

Trending

Generated by Feedzy