Connect with us


A physicist has worked out the math that makes “paradox-free” time travel plausible



Though time travel has yet to be achieved to the best of our knowledge, scientists are fascinated by the idea that it is theoretically possible.

Moving through time poses many challenges to the fundamental laws of the universe, as depicted in movies like The Terminator, Donnie Darko, Back to the Future, and many others. 

For example, if you travel through time and prevent your parents from meeting, how can you exist to travel through time in the first place?

The “grandfather paradox” is a major puzzle, but last September, Germain Tobar, an Australian physics student, said he had figured out how to “square the numbers” to make time travel possible without the paradoxes.

According to classical dynamics, knowing the state of a system at a given moment can provide information about the system’s entire history, Tobar said in September 2020.

“However, Einstein’s theory of general relativity predicts the existence of time loops or time travel – where an event can be both in the past and future of itself – which theoretically turns the study of dynamics on its head.”

The calculations show the possibility of space-time self-adapting to avoid paradoxes.

Imagine a time traveler going back in time to prevent the spread of a disease. If the mission is successful, the time traveler will have no disease to fight in the future.

According to Tobar’s research, the paradox would be resolved if the disease still managed to find a way to spread via a new pathway or technique. No matter what the time traveler accomplished, the disease would still exist.

Tobar’s work is difficult for non-mathematicians to understand, but it examines how deterministic processes – without any randomness – affect any number of regions in the space-time continuum, and shows how closed time-like curves – as predicted by Einstein – can be consistent with both classical physics and the laws of free will.

“The math checks out – and the results are the stuff of science fiction,” said University of Queensland physicist Fabio Costa, who supervised the research.

The latest study clears up the issue with another theory that time travel is possible, but with restrictions to avoid paradoxes. In this hypothetical scenario, time travelers are free to do as they please, but paradoxes are impossible.

The time machines that scientists have created so far are so high concept that they currently exist only as equations on paper. Although the math may work, actually bending space and time to go back in time remains elusive.

Stephen Hawking believed it was possible, so we might get there someday. If we did, this new study says, we would be free to change the past any way we wanted because it would adjust itself accordingly.

“Try as you might to create a paradox, events will always adjust themselves to avoid any inconsistency,” Costa says. Our discovery of a variety of mathematical techniques shows that free will time travel is logically consistent with our reality and presents no paradoxes.

Research Paper

Continue Reading


NASA Drops Bombshell; Admits Moon Landings Were Faked




Did you know NASA has finally revealed the truth about the fake moon landings?

Mainstream media barely reported on the astonishing revelations, so most people remain none the wiser about what NASA has admitted in the last 12 months. 

The truth of the matter is NASA has all but admitted the landings were fake, and anybody who works in the space industry or has any knowledge about rocket science has quietly accepted that the whole thing was a charade. So why the hell is nobody talking about this?

We literally didn’t go to the moon in 1969 and, to this day, no human being — American, Russian, Chinese or ancient Egyptian — has been past lower earth orbit which is about 1000 miles above sea level.

That’s right, no human being has ever been higher than 1000 miles above sea level… Except for those times we “went to the moon” which is 240,000 miles away. And guess what, we did that in 1969! When a computer with the computing power of a TI-89 graphing calculator was the size of a house. We didn’t even have the technology for VCRs yet. We didn’t even have microwaves.

Fast forward to today, over 50 years later, when an iPhone 12 has more computing power than every single computer on Earth in 1969 COMBINED.

And yet…. NASA claims that we can’t go back to the moon because we have “lost the technology” to go to the moon. Apparently it was “destroyed” but they won’t tell us how or why. 

Hmm… Seems legit.

But it gets even worse.

Tired of people asking to analyze the original moon landing tapes, NASA had to admit they had LOST them. Then the story changed and they claimed they had TAPED OVER THE ORIGINAL MOON LANDING TAPES because of budget cuts.

Apparently they have since found the original tapes in a suburban garden shed in Las Vegas. Conveniently for NASA, they weren’t found in a Hollywood basement used by Stanley Kubrick.

Because let’s face it, how likely is it that NASA would actually tape over the original footage of mankind’s greatest achievement? Because of budget cuts, really?

And the fact that the TV broadcast, watched by hundreds of millions, was not sent directly to TV stations but was rather a projection of the broadcast off a wall which was then recorded and sent out, doesn’t sound like NASA are covering their tracks or anything.

Let’s face facts. Everything that was done 50 years ago is a thousand times cheaper and easier to do today. Are we actually expected to believe that we went to the moon in this piece of shit 50 years ago? I’ve seen homeless encampments on Skid Row that have more insulation. I’ve seen Met Gala costumes that look sturdier than that.

It’s all so implausible. Who shot the event from outside the capsule? How is the American flag waving? Why do the shadows look like they are the result of multiple light sources? Why is the letter C visible on one of the rocks? (which happens to look like a prop on a film set)?

And don’t forget about the time NASA astronaut Alan Shepard supposedly sneaked a golf club and some balls onto Apollo 14 and played golf on the moon. Hold on, how do you sneak a golf club onto a space craft when every cubic inch and ounce is accounted for?

He sneaked it up his ass, obviously.

Really, let’s think about this rationally. In 1969 we sent a tiny homeless tent covered in aluminum foil 250,000 miles away to a precise location, when even being 1/10000 of an inch off in any part of the launch would have caused the ship to miss the moon by thousands of miles…. And yet, we landed it, we played golf… And now we can’t even get humans past 1000 miles above sea level.

Perhaps the final word should go to Buzz Aldrin. According to Buzz, we didn’t go to the moon at all! But he didn’t stop there. Listen to what he says about the hundreds of millions of people around the world who were affected by the moon landing. It’s call mass formation psychosis. The elite have been using this technique to brainwash the masses since 1969.

(Article by Baxter Dmitry republished from

Continue Reading


UFO in the form of a black cube was filmed over Texas




A video of a strange black object that appears to be a cube was filmed this week on Tuesday at an unspecified location in Texas, USA.

According to the unnamed author of the video, he and his wife looked up at the sky as a military plane that looked like an F-111 bomber flew west to east right over their house.

They regarded this incident as very unusual, since military aircraft had previously very rarely appeared in their area.

But they were even more confused when, literally “seconds later” after the bomber’s passage, a dark object appeared in the sky.

At first it seemed to them spherical, but then they considered that it was more like a cube. It is also possible that the object has changed its shape.

In the video, a man can be heard saying, “It’s so weird. A military plane flies by, and then THIS appears, whatever it is,” to which his wife replies, “I have no idea what it is.”

It is indicated that the man sent the video he shot to the UFO site MUFON. The eyewitness also admitted that the strange object could be something mundane, such as a baby balloon, but he thinks that this “air anomaly” emits some kind of glow, which is clearly not related to the properties of balloons.

In his opinion, this “glow” may be associated with the propulsion system of the aircraft.

Continue Reading


Generated by Feedzy