An Air Rod captured in a video still. Photo: Cryptid Wiki
Air rods, also known as “flying rods” or “sky fish,” are a phenomenon that been captured on cameras and mobile devices worldwide.
What are Air Rods?
An Air Rod captured on a trail camera.
Air rods are translucent or white creatures that appear on video and in pictures but can’t be seen with the naked eye.
Typically ranging in length from four inches to three feet, air rods have appendages that appear like fins or rapidly moving bee wings along their cylindrical shape.
It has been discovered that air rods are not merely smudges on camera lenses or film, but rather, they are three-dimensional objects that move through the environment. These findings have been confirmed by professional tests and analysis.
Interestingly, air rods exhibit intelligent behavior, such as flying in groups and engaging in playful activity. Additionally, they have been observed to avoid collisions with solid objects, implying a level of consciousness or sentience.
Air Rod Sightings
A video of a typical air rod sighting
In the 1990s, people started reporting seeing strange little translucent creatures in videos. People noticed peculiar distortions in various types of video, ranging from home videos to theatrical movies, which appeared to resemble blurry, mostly transparent rods, occasionally exhibiting a whitish color.
These fast-moving distortions were difficult to discern with the naked eye and were best visible against large, monochromatic backgrounds, such as the sky.
Individuals began scrutinizing films for such anomalies and coined the term “sky fishing” to describe their work, as they typically focused on examining the visible areas of the sky.
Their investigations revealed that air rods were present in numerous films, with countless examples lurking almost imperceptibly in the corners of old television shows, movies, and sporting event footage, among others. Given the sheer quantity of footage containing air rods, numbering in the thousands or tens of thousands, it was impossible to examine them all.
Possible Explanations for Air Rods
Air rods have been the subject of much speculation and debate, with believers in the cryptozoology-based theory suggesting that they are living creatures, possibly related to older stories of atmospheric beasts. According to this theory, air rods are thought to be some type of previously undiscovered organism.
Some of the more outlandish theories propose that air rods might not be made of matter and are instead made of electromagnetic fluxes or some other form of energy.
Others suggest that air rods are made of some undiscovered, fifth phase of matter, different from the traditional four states of solid, gas, liquid, and plasma. Another theory is that air rods could have evolved from organisms that are native to the clouds.
Other theories suggest that air rods may be tears in reality or condensed strings, a theoretical physical entity posited by the string theory of physics.
The most likely explanation for air rods however can be explained by experts in videography. They believe air rods are actually video artifacts that are created from motion blur, particularly in interlaced video recording. They are afterimage trails, typically of flying creatures such as insects. As such, belief in the existence of these creatures is practically non-existent among those versed in photography.
What do you think? Are air rods a cryptid or simply a video artifact? Let us know in the comments.
If you enjoyed this article you might like to learn about some other cryptids such as the Palmyra Wolves or the Not Deer.
Nandi Bear: A Ferocious African Cryptid
An artist’s interpretation of the Nandi Bear. Photo: Cryptid Archives.
The Nandi Bear is a ferocious cryptid spotted in the highlands of Kenya during the 19th and 20th centuries.
Description of the Nandi Bear
A footprint of a Nandibear
The Nandi Bear is also known as the Chemosit, Kerit, Koddoelo, Ngoloko, or Duba. It has been described as as a carnivorous animal with a formidable build, possessing long legs exceeding a height of four feet, and a back that slopes downward. It is described as being highly aggressive in nature.
Nandi Bear Sightings
A drawing of a Nandi Bear encounter by A. McWilliams
A number of early 20th century authors mention the Nandi Bear in their work.
Richard Meinertzhagen claimed in 1905 that he was told by the Nandi people that the Nandi bear was once widespread when they first settled in the highlands of present-day Kenya, around the early 17th century.
The Nandi people believed that the rinderpest epidemic towards the end of the 19th century pushed the Nandi bear to the brink of extinction. Although the Nandi bear was never numerous, it was not uncommon prior to the epidemic.
Unfortunately, the population never fully recovered from the impact of the outbreak. During the colonial era, the Nandi bear was held responsible for the deaths of numerous native people, whose skulls were found crushed every year.
While the Nandi Bear was widely feared by the native population, it does not appear to have been known to Europeans or colonial officials until the beginning of the 20th century.
Prior to 1912, the Nandi reportedly killed a Nandi Bear after it climbed onto the roof of a hut, broke through, and killed everyone inside. Subsequently, the village inhabitants burned down the hut with the animal still inside. Geoffrey Williams had heard of a similar animal’s preserved skin in Kabras, but was unsuccessful in obtaining it.
There were rumors that a Boer had shot a Nandi bear, but was unable to retrieve the carcass. C. W. Hobley wrote of this story.
Similarly, a farmer from Uganda named K. R. Williams supposedly unintentionally poisoned a young Nandi bear while setting out bait for hyenas.
Williams described the animal as being much larger than a spotted hyena, with the same yellowish fur, and a head similar to that of a bear. However, when he returned to his camp to retrieve a knife for skinning the carcass, actual hyenas had dragged the Nandi bear’s body away.
In 1905, while on the Nandi Expedition to the Uasin Gishu in western British East Africa, Geoffrey Williams wrote of his experiences with the Nandi Bear.
He observed an animal of around 5 feet in height sitting upright like a zoo bear, with small pointed ears and a long head, about 30 yards away.
The creature then ran away with a sideways canter towards the Sirgoit Rock. Williams quickly took a snapshot of the animal with his rifle, but missed it.
He claimed the Nandi bear was larger than a typical zoo bear and heavily built, with thick fur covering its forequarters and all four legs. The hindquarters were relatively smooth, and the color was dark.
Williams could not recall much about the ears, but mentioned that they were small, and the tail, if any, was tiny and barely noticeable.
Engineer Dennis Burnett and his wife Marlene reported the most recent documented sighting of the Nandi bear in February 1998.
While driving along the Koru-Kisumu road near the base of the Nandi Escarpment during a rainy evening, they saw a large animal crossing the road.
Upon reversing their car, the couple observed the animal for about fifteen seconds. Although they initially thought it was a bear, they soon realized that it was “an enormous, shaggy hyena – resembling a Striped Hyena but significantly larger.”
Theories about the Nandi Bear
Bob Gymlan of Bigfoot hunting fame has posted a detailed video telling the history of the Nandi Bear.
In 1923, Charles William Andrews proposed that the Nandi bear might be a surviving species of the extinct Chalicothere. Louis Leakey later suggested in the 1930s that the Nandi Bear’s descriptions matched those of the Chalicothere, despite chalicotheres being herbivores.
The Chalicothere hypothesis was eventually abandoned. In 2000, paleontologist Louis L. Jacobs stated that if Chalicotheres still existed, they would have been discovered, much like the giant forest hog. Jacobs concluded that if there was any truth to the Nandi bear story, it could be a description of gorillas passed down orally across the continent.
Zoologist Reginald Innes Pocock argued that the Nandi bear sightings were actually misidentified spotted hyenas. The British Natural History Museum also stated in 1932 that many reports of the Nandi bear were nothing more than spotted hyenas.
Paleontologist George Gaylord Simpson claimed that the Nandi bear turned out to be honey badgers, which zoologists had been aware of since 1776.
Have you ever seen a Nandi Bear? Let us know in the comments.
If you enjoyed learning about the Nandi Bear you might also be interested in the J’Ba Fofi: A Giant Congolese Spider Cryptid or the Tikoloshe, a South African Cryptid.
Squonk: The Saddest Cryptid
The Squonk as featured in Fearsome Creatures of the Lumberwoods by William Cox. Photo: Wikipedia
The Squonk is said to be the ugliest creature in the world. It is so ashamed of its appearance that it will hide from anyone who approaches and, if caught, it will dissolve into a puddle of tears.
The Legend of the Squonk
The rock band Genesis wrote a popular song about the Squonk
The first mention of the squonk in written history is in William Cox’s 1910 book “Fearsome Creatures of the Lumberwoods, With a Few Desert and Mountain Beasts.”
Cox describes the as the ugliest animal in the world and claims it is aware of its unfortunate appearance.
Cox claims that the squonk used to have a wide distribution and preferred habitats with plenty of desert vegetation on high plains. As these areas changed into swampy, lake-dotted regions, the squonk was forced to adapt to the water.
Due to its low intelligence, the squonk constantly searched for food by swimming in the marshes, and over time developed webbing between its toes, but only on its left feet that were submerged in water. As a result, it could only swim in circles and could never return to shore, leading to thousands of squonks dying from starvation, as evidenced by fossil bones found in the lake bottoms.
Cox also claimed that the squonk can only be found in the hemlock forests of Pennsylvania. It is said to be shy and reclusive, and can be seen mostly during twilight hours.
It is covered in a loose and warty skin that doesn’t fit properly. The squonk is known to be perpetually unhappy and often weeps due to its distressing appearance, leaving a trail of tears that can be followed.
The best time to search for a squonk is during moonlit nights, as it tends to stay hidden in its hemlock dwelling, afraid to catch a glimpse of itself in a reflective pool.
Sometimes, the sound of a softly weeping squonk can be heard, which sounds like a mournful call resembling that of the cross-feathered snee.
A Mr. J.P. Wentling had a disappointing experience with a squonk near Mont Alto. He captured the squonk by mimicking its crying sounds and tricking it into hopping into a sack. As he carried it home the sack suddenly became much lighter. Wentling unslung the sack and looked in. He found that the squonk had dissolved into tears and bubbles.
A variation of the squonk meme that has become popular in recent times.
The squonk has become a meme in recent times, with many internet users feeling like they can relate to the poor little creature. The squonk has even featured in one of our paranormal meme dumps.
Have you ever seen a poor little squonk in the wild? Let us know in the comments.
If you enjoyed this article you might also be interested in the story of the kushtaka or the Central American Whintosser.
Ghosts8 months ago
Zozo: The Ouija Board Demon
Space6 months ago
Scientists claim to have found the answer what existed before the Universe
General7 months ago
Mysterious creature like Demogorgon from the “Stranger Things” filmed in India
General7 months ago
Where did ships from the Middle Ages come from in the US deserts?
General3 months ago