The idea of overthrowing humanity with artificial intelligence has been discussed for decades, and in 2021 scientists delivered their verdict on whether high-level computer superintelligence can be controlled.
The scientists said that the catch is that in order to control a superintelligence that is far beyond human understanding, it will be necessary to simulate this superintelligence, which can be analyzed and controlled. But if people are not able to understand this, then it is impossible to create such a simulation.
The study was published in the Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research .
Rules such as “do not harm people” cannot be set if people do not understand what scenarios AI has to offer, scientists say. Once a computer system is running at a level beyond the capabilities of our programmers, then no more limits can be set.
“Superintelligence is a fundamentally different problem than those that are usually studied under the slogan “robotic ethics. This is due to the fact that the superintelligence is multifaceted and, therefore, is potentially able to mobilize a variety of resources to achieve goals that are potentially incomprehensible to humans, not to mention that they can be controlled,” the researchers write.
Part of the team’s reasoning came from the halting problem posed by Alan Turing in 1936. The Halting problem – Given a program/algorithm will ever halt or not? Halting means that the program on certain input will accept it and halt or reject it and halt and it would never go into an infinite loop. Basically halting means terminating.
As Turing proved through some smart math, while we can know that for some specific programs, it’s logically impossible to find a way that will allow us to know that for every potential program that could ever be written. That brings us back to AI, which in a super-intelligent state could feasibly hold every possible computer program in its memory at once.
Any program written to stop AI from harming humans and destroying the world, for example, may reach a conclusion (and halt) or not – it’s mathematically impossible for us to be absolutely sure either way, which means it’s not containable.
The scientists said the alternative to teaching the AI some ethics and telling it not to destroy the world — something that no algorithm can be absolutely sure of — is to limit the capabilities of the superintelligence.
“The study rejected this idea, too, suggesting that it would limit the reach of the artificial intelligence; the argument goes that if we’re not going to use it to solve problems beyond the scope of humans, then why create it at all?
f we are going to push ahead with artificial intelligence, we might not even know when a super-intelligence beyond our control arrives, such is its incomprehensibility. That means we need to start asking some serious questions about the directions we’re going in.” the scientists noted.
CNN Anchor Claims Dangerous Filthy Slums in America Are ‘Vibrant Expressions of Democracy’
CNN host Fareed Zakaria aired an astonishing rant this past
weekend arguing that major US cities are filthy and dangerous because of
“democracy,” and that makes them more “vibrant.”
Zakaria was attempting to provide a counter argument to Tucker
Carlson’s recent report that Russia’s subways are nicer than America’s.
Modernity.news reports: “American cities are expressions of democracy,” Zakaria asserted, claiming they are “places where people have to negotiate differences and find ways to live together, that makes them messier and dirtier and sometimes chaotic.”
He then argued “perhaps that is what has made these cities so vibrant and innovative, and why they have been at the forefront in making America the country that leads the world in economics, technology, culture and power.”
Is rampant crime, homelessness, and drug use part of said vibrancy?
Fact check. American cities were not shit holes when the country emerged as the envy of the world.
Zakaria continued, “Carlson speaks enviously of cities like Tokyo, Singapore, Abu Dhabi and Dubai, and they are indeed wonderful in their own distinctive ways. But what’s striking about all of them is that they are somewhat tame and subdued. The product of authoritarian governments or conformist culture, or both. American cities are different.”
He appears to be seriously claiming that you cannot have a clean and safe city without some kind of evil dictatorship overseeing it.
Zakaria continued “Carlson put forward a bizarre hodgepodge of assertions he thought the architecture, food and service in Moscow was better than in any American city. Really? Moscow?”
“Outside of a small historic center, it is filled with drab Soviet era concrete buildings. And while the food in Moscow can be quite good…Better than New York or San Francisco? You need to get out more” Zakaria concluded.
Has he been to San Francisco lately?
Ghosts2 years ago
Zozo: The Ouija Board Demon
Space1 year ago
Scientists claim to have found the answer what existed before the Universe
Ghosts1 year ago
Old Coot of Mount Greylock
Archaeology12 months ago
New discoveries at Ekʼ Balam during conservation works
General3 years ago
UC San Francisco engaging in horrifying experiments, organ harvesting of live babies in the name of “science”